So,
first of all, when I first tried to think about a topic for this paper, nothing
really came to mind. So I was
actually surprised to discover how easy it was to write three pages on this.
I
had to really work on not being “whiny.”
Because I was so close to this topic, I wanted to speak in first person
all the time. I had to force
myself to be a bit more objective, but I worry that my tone isn’t as . . .
steady, maybe? As it could be.
I
think my paper has quite a lot of pathos.
Maybe too much. I noticed
as I wrote it, and then again as I went back to edit, that my tone got
progressively more passionate throughout the paper. I felt like it sounded almost like I was growing hysterical,
which isn’t what I wanted at all. So I tried to fix that by cutting out some of my first person
statements and making it a little less . . . accusing. I sort of developed an accusing tone in
my first draft that I wanted to get rid of. Hopefully I accomplished that.
My
paper has either a lot of ethos or very little, depending on the perspective
you take. I’m very close to my
topic; I speak with authority there, because I’m an illustration major and
people have told me this joke. But in a way that almost lessens my credibility,
because I’m almost too close to the
topic. It diminishes my perceived
ability to speak reasonably. I
tried to combat that in my final draft by focusing more on respect in general,
rather than respect for art majors, and by including examples of others who I
know have been hurt by a lack of respect for their career choices.
Logically,
I feel like my topic is pretty sound.
I don’t feel like it’s too much to ask that we respect each other. But I felt like my final draft needed
some more logos, so I included some statistics on finances and the like. I don’t feel like logos is my
strongest area, but I also don’t feel like it’s weak.
So,
yeah. I
think I need to work on my writing tone a bit more. I’m not sure how to paper turned out in the end. I’ll have to give it a few days and
then go back and reread it to see what I think.
My paper was also very one sided. It had a lot of logos and not so much ethos.
ReplyDelete